Challenges and benefits of the microservice architectural style

An excellent overview of the challenges and benefits of the Microservices architectural style of software application development.  While many of the factors discussed by the author (Dr. André Fachat, published January 30, 2019), these same factors can affect the safety and efficacy of a medical devices using this style.  The article consists of two parts:

https://developer.ibm.com/articles/challenges-and-benefits-of-the-microservice-architectural-style-part-1/

https://developer.ibm.com/depmodels/microservices/articles/challenges-and-benefits-of-the-microservice-architectural-style-part-2/

Can architectural design create safer software?  We believe so.  IEC/TR 80002-1 supports that notion as well.  One can argue that microservices are less likely to be impacted by certain types of software coding errors than a monolithic application.  Additionally the greater decoupling achieved with microservices can reduce the number of regression tests that one might perform when a new software version of the application is created.  Clearly, two very important reasons one might consider microservices architecture when designing SaMD and some SiMD (software in a medical device).

See a related post:  Challenges with Software Risk Analysis

About the author

Partner and General Manager, Brian Pate is ISO 1385:2016 Lead Auditor certified for Medical Device Quality Management Systems (MD), and ISO 19011:2018 Management Systems Auditing (AU) and Leading Management Systems Audit Teams (TL). Brian started his medical device career in anesthesia clinical research in 1985 and has since worked both academia and industry including many years with Johnson & Johnson, Baxter Healthcare, and GE Medical. Brian’s roles have included software engineering, systems engineering, quality assurance, and regulatory affairs. Brian has served on multiple AAMI TIR working groups, including TIR32-2008 (Application of ISO 14971 Risk Management to Software; now IEC 80002-1) and TIR45-2012 (Guidance on the use of Agile practices in the development of medical device software) and served as a reviewer for the 2nd edition of TIR45. Brian serves on the AAMI Software Committee and as an AAMI instructor for the software, design controls, and agile methods courses. Brian also is a member of the Underwriters’ Laboratories (UL) Standards Technical Panel for UL1998 (Software in Programmable Components) and or UL5500 (Remote Software Updates).

SoftwareCPR Training Courses

ISO13485:2016 ISO 13485 Internal Audit(or) Training Course (Live, 3-day)

IEC 62304 and other Emerging Standards Impacting Medical Device Software (Live, 3-day)

Being Agile & Yet CompliantISO 14971 SaMD Risk Management

Software Risk Management

Medical Device Cybersecurity

Software Verification

IEC 62366 Usability Process and Documentation

Or just email training@softwarecpr.com for more info.

Corporate Office

15148 Springview St.
Tampa, FL 33624
USA
+1-781-721-2921
Partners located in the US (CA, FL, MA, MN, TX) and Canada.